http://wormholetravel.net/
In the
history of ideas the 19th century is marked by an extraordinary development of
logic/ A discipline which had remained for more than twenty centuries in
approximately the state to which the mind of Aristotle reduced it, suddenly
entered upon a period of rapid growth and systematic development. While the essential elements of the
Aristotelian logic have been overthrown or
shaken, the labors of Boole, Russel,
Whitehaed and a host of fellow workers have produced a calculus of classes
and a calculus of propositions in which Aristotelian theory of the syllogism is
seen to occupy only a tiny corner. The potentialities of the new logic as a
scientific instrument have already been indicated in the illumination which the
application of modern logic has brought to the foundation of maths. The field
of logic has been traditionally restricted to propositions true or false in
themselves: the realm of fiction and fictions has appeared to lie beyond the
domain of logic. But the development of the concepts of system and order in the
new logic shows this limitation to be unjustified. Sentences which have a
variable truth value relative to a defining set of postulates or hypotheses are
as susceptible to logical analysis as any of the sentences about the mortality
of Socrates that filled the older textbooks.
Mathematical Logic is the outcome of the joining together of four
different lines of thought. There are
1) old logic, the invention Aristotle; 2) the idea of a complete and automatic
language for reasoning; 3) the new developments in algebra and geometry which
took place after 1825 and 4) the idea of the parts of maths as being systems of
deductions, that is of chains of reasoning in agreement with rules of logic.
These rules give one the power to go from a statement s1 to another
statement s2 when s2 is necessarily true if s1 is
taken to be true.
1)
Aristotle syllogistic is a theory of syllogistic implication, i.e. implications
with two and only two conditions (premises) and one outcome (conclusions). What
Aristotle made the attempt to do was to give a complete account of the
different possible detailed forms of syllogistic implications and a complete
body of rules as tests of the validity of the validity of any given syllogistic
implication. However, both Aristotle's and his successors' logic was one of the
rules whose statement was in everyday language (Latin); no special signs for
the operations of reasoning were used and they seemed to have no idea that it was
possible for logic to be turned into a sort of maths. So they took no step
forward in the direction of turning logic into mathematical logic.
2) Descartes appeared to have been the
first person to have the idea of a general language - "universal" -
as sort of arithmetic, though he made no
attempt to suggest such a language. A little later Leibnitz had designs for a new and general language that were not
unlike Descartes', but he took then some stages further. But though he
frequently gave attention to the idea of such language, he did little with it.
His designs go no further then being designs - and rough ones.
3) Between
1825 and 1900 algebra and geometry underwent great changes which had a strong
effect upon the growth of mathematical
logic. Abel's and Galoi's group
theory came quickly into being as the first new branch of abstract algebra.
The systems of vector algebra and matrix algebra were worked out not long after
the death of Galois in 1832. These systems were company for group theory as new
branches of abstract algebra.
4) The idea
of the parts of maths as system of deductions goes back to Euclid's Elements. What a system of deduction is.
This question was viewed in the 1890s as interesting and important by that
Italian school of maths that was headed by Peano.
Peano's work followed by that one by D.Hilbert
had a great effect of later
development of logic. From their work came a new branch of mathematical logic: metamathematics. The birth of mathematical logic was in the 1840s.
Boole's Algebra of Logic
What was
the start of mathematical logic? The shortest and simplest answer is George Boole's Mathematical Analysis of
Logic of 1847. The earlier teaching in logic of which Boole had a knowledge
and which had an effect on him were, on the one hand, those of the old logic
and, on the other hand, those of W.Hamilton and De Morgan.
The name
used in logic and maths for a group of all the things that have a certain
simple or complex property is class and
the things that have the property are said to be the element of the class. The
ideas of class and lass elements are root ideas in all present-day maths. The
outcome of the Hamilton - De Morgan theory was to make possible a view of logic
as being at least in one of its branches an algebra of classes. Boole was the
first man to have this view clearly and where others had been completely at a
loss, he was able to give a good theory of it. Moreover, Boole was the first
man to give a united theory of logic in his second work The Law of Thought.
Much of the
work in mathematical logic in the 100 years and more that have gone by after The Laws of Thought has been given to
taking out the errors from Boole's ideas, making some of the parts of his
theory stronger, putting his algebra in the form of a system of deductions and,
lastly moving from it towards more general theories in abstract algebra, for
example, towards the theory of those "partordered" classes every two
elements of which have a greatest lower limit and a smallest higher limit named
lattices.
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий